Why this statement exists
Sections 2257 and 2257A of Title 18 of the United States Code, together with 28 C.F.R. Part 75, place record-keeping, labelling and inspection duties on producers of certain visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct. Readers arriving from adult platforms expect to see where a site stands on those rules. This page states the position plainly.
What is published here
The pages of this site are reviews, rankings, comparisons and explanatory articles. The visual material on them consists of portraits and editorial illustration. Nothing published here is a depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 2256.
Nothing is filmed, photographed, digitised, edited or otherwise created here from explicit source material. No explicit files are uploaded, stored, transcoded or served from this domain.
Why the rules do not attach
A producer under 18 U.S.C. 2257(h) is a party that creates, or assembles for distribution, the depictions the statute describes. This site does neither. It writes about people who publish on a platform, and it links to that platform.
Since no depiction covered by 2256 is produced or assembled here, the record-keeping, labelling and inspection duties in 2257, 2257A and 28 C.F.R. Part 75 do not apply to this site.
Who does hold records
Content on OnlyFans is held by that platform, whose provider is Fenix International Limited, under its own terms and its own compliance obligations. Any age-verification and record-keeping duty for that content sits with that platform and with the individual creators who upload to it. Those duties are not delegated to, shared with, or discharged by this site.
Images used in reviews
Where a page here carries a portrait of a creator, it is a profile-style image used for editorial identification, published in a form suitable for a review page rather than an explicit one. If you believe an image on this site was published without the right permission, write to [email protected] with the page URL and we will take it down while we check.
If an image shows someone in an intimate context without consent, use /ncii-report/, which runs on a 48-hour clock rather than the ordinary editorial timeline.
Nothing here is a waiver
This statement describes why the cited provisions do not apply. It is not an admission that they do apply, and it does not waive any right or defence.
Who is responsible
This is an independent editorial project. There is no registered company, no commercial register entry and no VAT identification number. Responsible for editorial content: Editorial Lead, onlyseeker.ai. Questions about this statement go to [email protected], first reply within 72 hours and a final answer within 5 business days.
If this ever changes
If this site ever began to host, cache or serve explicit files from its own infrastructure, the analysis above would no longer hold and this statement would have to be rewritten before that happened. No such change is planned, and the editorial model does not require one.
Questions people ask
Does this site hold 2257 records?
No. Records exist where explicit content is produced and hosted. That is the platform and the creators publishing on it, not an editorial site that writes reviews and links out.
Whose records cover OnlyFans content?
OnlyFans, whose provider is Fenix International Limited, holds records for content on its platform under its own compliance statements and terms of service.
Are the portraits on review pages explicit?
No. They are profile-style images used to identify the person a review is about. Explicit material is not published on this domain in any form.
Who do I write to about an image on a review page?
[email protected] for permission and licensing questions. [email protected] if the issue is consent, where the response time drops to 48 hours.
Is there a named custodian of records here?
No, because there are no records of that kind to keep. Editorial responsibility sits with the Editorial Lead role, reachable at [email protected].