Responsible AI Use

Generated imagery has made consent the central question in this industry. This page sets out the lines this site holds when it writes about people who publish adult content, and what happens when one is crossed.

The principle

Consent belongs to the person depicted, and no technical detail changes that. Whether an image was taken with a camera, edited, or produced entirely by a model, the only question that matters is whether the person in it agreed to it existing and being published.

What is never published here

No synthetic likeness of a real person appears on this site, for any purpose, including illustration. No image is altered to place someone in a context they were not in. Nothing that purports to show a person in an intimate setting is published here unless it came from that person's own public profile.

What is never linked

No link goes out to a service that produces intimate imagery of real people from ordinary photographs, however it markets itself. No link goes out to material that a report has identified as published without consent, and where such a link is found it is removed rather than replaced with a warning.

This is not a ranking penalty. It is a category this site does not cover at all.

What is never sold

Some money is not worth taking. Commercial arrangements are refused from services that generate intimate imagery of real people, from platforms that tolerate material published without consent, from anything marketed to children, and from any product that misrepresents the age or the consent of the people in its output.

The site is funded by affiliate commissions on subscriptions to creators it reviews. That is the whole model, and /editorial-policy/ sets out how it is kept away from ranking decisions.

Writing about creators who use generated content

A creator using generated or assisted material on their own profile is describing their own work with their own likeness, which is theirs to do. Where it is visible and a reader would want to know, the review says so plainly. Where it is only a suspicion, it is not printed.

Language

People here are described as professionals publishing commercial work. Their identity is not sexualised beyond what they publish about themselves, their private identity is not linked to their creator identity, and no word or framing that implies anyone under 18 appears anywhere on this site, in any context, including tags and image descriptions.

Coverage is not permanent

Nobody has to stay in this catalogue. A creator who asks for removal is removed within 5 business days, with no justification asked for and no attempt at persuasion. That request can arrive from any address and through any of the channels at /legal-contact/.

When a line is crossed

If material on this site turns out to show someone without their consent, it comes down within 48 hours of a valid report, through the process at /ncii-report/. Reports can be anonymous. The same clock applies whether the image is a photograph or generated.

Where a report shows that the source of an image cannot be trusted, everything from that source is removed, not only the item reported.

Responsibility

This is an independent editorial project with no registered company. Responsible for editorial content: Editorial Lead, onlyseeker.ai. Concerns about coverage go to [email protected], first reply within 72 hours, final answer within 5 business days.

Questions people ask

Do you cover services that generate intimate images of real people?

No. They are not reviewed, not linked and not accepted as commercial partners. It is a category this site stays out of entirely.

How is a generated image treated in a report?

Exactly like a photograph. The test is whether the person depicted consented, not how the file was made, and the removal clock is the same 48 hours.

What if a creator uses generated content on their own profile?

That is their work and their likeness. Where it is visible and useful to a reader, the review says so. Suspicion alone is not printed.

Can a creator be removed from the catalogue?

Yes, on request, within 5 business days. No reason is required and no negotiation follows. Write to [email protected].

What happens to other images from a bad source?

They are removed too. Once a source is shown to be unreliable about consent, everything traced to it comes down, not only the reported item.